Chines trackless trams, guided busway reasons why rubber tyred trolley, diesel, bendy, buses, cannot compete with steel wheeled trams

Why trams not buses are the backbone to most low traffic and congestion cities See also: https://bathtrams.uk/8th-in-sequence-of-tram-letters-in-bath-chronicle-chinese-tram-bus-why-rubber-tyred-tram-buses-dont-work/ It is worth explaining the fundamental engineering differences between a steel wheeled light rail or tram and a rubber tyred bus (whether battery, trolley, diesel, or electric, Chinese Zhouzou tram bus) and why trams are nearly always the […]

Read More

7th in sequence of tram letters in Bath Chronicle

See also https://bathtrams.uk/8th-in-sequence-of-tram-letters-in-bath-chronicle/   Dear Chronicle Lawrence Sanders’ letter suggesting trolley buses for Bath was interesting so it is worth explaining the fundamental difference between a tram and a bus. ( trolley or diesel, or electric bus) What it comes down to is that trams are expensive to buy, but cheap to operate on each […]

Read More

Why the so called link road for Bath is not needed and won’t cut congestion -1 ( Adam Reynolds)

See second letter from Adam Reynolds – “Unique insight into why link road won’t work” – printed below: ” Unique insight into why link won’t work Richard Luetchford, whose letter described the long-delayed A36/ A46 link road as unfairly derided, should have attended the excellent council-hosted Bath Hacked Hack- athon held last year that enabled […]

Read More

6th in sequence of tram letters in Bath Chronicle

see also: https://bathtrams.uk/7th-tranche-of-letters-in-bath-chronicle/ Letter from Dave Andrews Dear Sirs, John Carson makes a number of useful and insightful points about the difficulties buried utilities can create for tram re–installs. However they are not not as great as he implies.  Edinburgh Tram was based on a heavy, sleepered rail system and trams, and these impose pressure at a far […]

Read More